Explore Page

Jared Hess

Sometimes the Most Toxic People in Your Life Are the Ones You Call Family Sometimes the Most Toxic People in Your Life Are the Ones You Call Family One of the hardest lessons I’ve learned in life is that sharing blood doesn’t always mean sharing love, respect, or understanding. For years, I’ve experienced the emotional toll of unhealthy family dynamics, narcissistic behavior, and relationships where accountability seemed almost impossible. I’ve learned that protecting your peace doesn’t mean you hate your family. Sometimes it means you finally recognize your own worth. I’m here because I believe people who’ve experienced these struggles need to stand together. We need a place where we can share our stories, support one another, and remind each other that we’re not alone. If you’ve ever felt like the outsider in your own family, I want you to know something: Your voice matters. Your experiences matter. And your healing matters. Let’s build a community where understanding is stronger than judgment.

dan

Your question, How can we know the truth in Christ? I’m writing this so you can distinguish between truth and deception, between light and darkness. Between understanding and human reasoning, between wisdom and ignorance, ignorance is not merely the absence of knowledge. It is a state of mind that leads to eternal damnation. Let me attempt to explain the distinction between knowledge and understanding. For instance, consider a child learning his ABCs or counting from one to a hundred. They have committed these to memory, but they lack comprehension of their purpose. Subsequently, they may declare, “I understand.” But this is knowledge without understanding. The same principle applies to God’s word. A person can learn the Bible’s words, memorize them, yet still fail to grasp their meaning.  Here’s an example of the Father revealing his truth to someone. When Christ asked his disciples about his identity, Peter responded with the following.  Matthew 16:15-17 “He said unto them, But whom say you that I am? 16 And Simon Peter answered and said, You are the Christ, the Son of the living God. Jesus responded and said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Barjona. For flesh and blood has not revealed it to you, but my Father who is in heaven.” In Peter’s case, it was the Father who imparted his understanding to him.  As to Pilate his knowledge of Jesus was based on what he was told by other.  John 18:33-34 33 Then Pilate entered into the judgment hall again, and called Jesus, and said unto him, Art thou the King of the Jews? 34 Jesus answered him, Sayest thou this thing of thyself, or did others tell it thee of me? Now if Pilate truly believed Jesus was a king the Son of God, he would not have crucified him. Listen to what the Apostle wrote. (See comment for the rest)

justme

🚀 What Have 50 Years of Mars Exploration Left Behind? Mars may look like a vast, untouched red desert, but robotic exploration has left traces of human technology across its surface. From discarded parachutes and heat shields to spacecraft landing components, every successful mission can leave hardware behind. NASA has documented debris from the Perseverance rover's landing system, including its parachute, backshell, heat shield, and descent stage. These components helped deliver the rover safely to the Martian surface, but some were discarded or came to rest away from the rover after landing. 🔴 What kind of spacecraft debris remains on Mars? 🔭 How do scientists identify these objects? 🛰️ What can old landing equipment teach us about future missions? 🌌 Could future exploration reduce the amount of human-made material left behind? The Red Planet is not just a world of rocks and dust—it is also a record of humanity's journey into space. Important note: The exact claim that Mars contains 15,400 pounds of metallic debris requires reliable verification. NASA confirms that spacecraft landing hardware and debris remain on Mars, but this description does not present that specific total as an established fact. Follow for more fascinating discoveries about Mars, space exploration, astronomy, and the mysteries of our universe. #Mars #NASA #SpaceExploration #MarsRover #SpaceFacts #Astronomy #RedPlanet #ScienceFacts #Universe #SpaceDiscovery

justme

At 74, America’s most beloved comedian put on filthy clothes and slept on heating grates. She was hospitalized for it. Critics hated it. She did it anyway—because someone had to. November 5, 1985. Millions of Americans tuned into CBS expecting Lucille Ball to do what she had done better than anyone for half a century: make them laugh. Instead, they saw Lucy—their Lucy—almost unrecognizable. No red hair. No glamour. No perfectly timed slapstick. Just a 74-year-old woman in rags, pushing a shopping cart filled with everything she owned, sleeping on Manhattan streets, invisible to the people stepping over her. Lucille Ball was playing Florabelle, a homeless elderly woman in the TV movie Stone Pillow. She named the character after her grandmother, Flora Belle Hunt—a pioneer woman who had survived hardships Lucy never forgot. America didn’t know how to react. For fifty years, Lucille Ball had been the face of American comedy. She built an empire. She became the first woman to own a major television studio. She made three generations laugh until they cried. At 74, she was rich beyond imagination. She could have spent her final years accepting lifetime achievement awards, appearing on talk shows, protecting the legend. Instead, she chose the most difficult role of her life. The script for Stone Pillow landed on her desk in 1985. It told the story of elderly homeless women—the ones society refused to see. Women sleeping on heating grates, pushing shopping carts, dismissed as “bag ladies.” In 1980s America, homelessness was exploding. Television largely ignored it. And almost no one talked about elderly women living on the streets—abandoned by families, failed by systems, erased by society. Lucy saw something others didn’t: a chance to use her fame for something that mattered. She knew the risks. She knew audiences didn’t want to see their Lucy dirty, broken, heartbreaking. She knew critics might savage her. She knew it could tarnish the image she’d spent decades building. S

Dan

Your question, How can we know the truth in Christ? I’m writing this so you can distinguish between truth and deception, between light and darkness. Between understanding and human reasoning, between wisdom and ignorance, ignorance is not merely the absence of knowledge. It is a state of mind that leads to eternal damnation. Let me attempt to explain the distinction between knowledge and understanding. For instance, consider a child learning his ABCs or counting from one to a hundred. They have committed these to memory, but they lack comprehension of their purpose. Subsequently, they may declare, “I understand.” But this is knowledge without understanding. The same principle applies to God’s word. A person can learn the Bible’s words, memorize them, yet still fail to grasp their meaning.  Here’s an example of the Father revealing his truth to someone. When Christ asked his disciples about his identity, Peter responded with the following.  Matthew 16:15-17 “He said unto them, But whom say you that I am? 16 And Simon Peter answered and said, You are the Christ, the Son of the living God. Jesus responded and said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Barjona. For flesh and blood has not revealed it to you, but my Father who is in heaven.” In Peter’s case, it was the Father who imparted his understanding to him.  As to Pilate his knowledge of Jesus was based on what he was told by other.  John 18:33-34 33 Then Pilate entered into the judgment hall again, and called Jesus, and said unto him, Art thou the King of the Jews? 34 Jesus answered him, Sayest thou this thing of thyself, or did others tell it thee of me? Now if Pilate truly believed Jesus was a king the Son of God, he would not have crucified him. Listen to what the Apostle wrote. (See comment for the rest)

Urieta-Chisholm-Doyle

## Black Parking Enforcer Almost Risks Life to Ticket Grieving Family *Fictional dramatization—not a report on a verified real-world incident.* It was just after 10 p.m. when the Black parking enforcement officer rolled slowly down the block. His vehicle moved at the kind of pace that made drivers glance in their mirrors—too slow to ignore, too deliberate to dismiss. He stopped. Across the street, a grieving family stood outside, still carrying the weight of a loss that had happened only hours earlier. They had not received a ticket. Nothing had been placed under a windshield wiper. No citation had been written. But the officer’s vehicle sat there anyway, engine running, headlights cutting through the dark. He looked toward the cars. He looked toward the family. Then he remained stopped, as if deciding whether the night required paperwork. For the family, the moment felt cruel. They were not being fined, but they felt watched—marked, even—while trying to survive one of the worst nights of their lives. A grieving mother later said the silence felt worse than a ticket would have. “He didn’t have to say anything,” she said. “He just sat there, like he was waiting for a reason.” For the officer, the stop may have seemed routine: checking plates, scanning for violations, doing the job he was assigned. But at 10 p.m., outside a grieving family, routine can look like a threat. And for a Black enforcement worker alone in a vehicle at night, every slow roll past an angry street carries risk he cannot fully control. No ticket was issued. No words were exchanged. Yet the encounter still left a mark. The family wanted an apology. The officer wanted to go home safely. And the city was left with a question it could not easily answer: why did a grieving family have to feel targeted by a government vehicle before anyone decided that compassion mattered? Sources

Explore | LocalAll