Category Page news

The Country We're Living In Has Became Unjustified..

Why Black People will NEVER truly achieve "JUSTICE" in America? First and foremost the CONSTITUTION and the LAWS , CODES and "STATUES were rooted in EUROPEAN COLONY evolving into WHITE ETHNOSTATES whose culture was based upon WHITE SUPREMACISTS IDEOLOGY...So "JUSTICE " in essence was based upon WHITE SUPREMACISTS IDEOLOGY and when you look at the first definition of "JUSTICE " you get "the exercise of AUTHORITY in VINDICATION," so in the early "JUSTICE " system in America,based on WHITE SUPREMACISTS IDEOLOGY, THE ONLY "AUTHORITY", in AMERIKKKA, was WHITE MEN! And when you look at the word"VINDICATION" which comes from the Latin "VINDICTA" meaning "REVENGE" , so who ALWAYS CONTROLLED the "JUSTICE " system in America? WHITE MEN, therefore ONLY WHITE MEN can administer REVENGE"Legally" ,even white women have to appeal to white men for "JUSTICE" for only they can UTILIZE VIOLENCE to enforce "JUSTICE"! They have NEVER FREELY GIVEN US A DAMN THING, We always had to FIGHT for it. We are the product of the VICTIMS of the BREEDING FARMS, BRED to be PHYSICALLY SUPERIOR to Our Ancestors, bred to be PHYSICALLY SUPERIOR to even the WHITE MEN who FORCED Our Ancestors to BREED. They ended up needing to RECRUIT Us, to co-op Us to AID in their "JUSTICE" system, either OFFICIALLY or UNOFFICIALLY. They take Our KINDNESS, Our PATIENCE, as WEAKNESS. They NEED OUR COOPERATION for WHITE SUPREMACISTS IDEOLOGY, the "JUSTICE" system that makes it possible. We change Our MINDS, WE CHANGE THE RESULTS! VINDICTA#SystemicRacism #RacialJustice #JusticeMatters #Justice #Injustice #WhatHappenedToJustice #CivilRightsLegacy

“Why Are Americans Losing Faith in the Media?”

Every side claims bias, every story gets questioned, and fewer people trust what they read or watch.#FaithThroughLoss So how did we get here — and can journalism ever earn that trust back?#MediaTrust #MediaBias #LostFaithInLove

Specifying what SNAP can and can't be spent on doesn't work in real life. Again, a large percentage of people receiving SNAP have full time jobs. They pay taxes too. Yes, they are just basically getting their own tax money back. Again, they need to focus and single out fraudsters, particularly the establishments that are buying them. What we could do is change the tax code so that low income people under a certain income amount are exempt from some taxes. I'm sure there is a better idea out there, like living wages, but that won't work in an oligarchy.

Has anyone seen the next door neighbor's kids? their Mom is looking for them. #snowmaneatschildren

A Very American Christmas Comeback Story It’s the kind of story that feels uniquely American — hard times, resilience, and a comeback just in time for Christmas.#ChristmasStory #AmericanResilience #ComebackStory #Hope Against the odds, perseverance and hope won out, reminding us that even after setbacks, a second chance is possible. Sometimes, the greatest victories aren’t loud — they’re personal.#Perseverance #HolidaySpirit #NewsBreak

25 Years Inside the Federal System — What I Learned About America’s Prisons & Why Reform Can’t Wait

I spent 25 years in federal prison. There are five security levels: minimum, low, medium, high, and administrative max (ADX). I never made it to a minimum. Beyond those, there are two behavior management programs — the Special Management Unit (SMU) and the Communication Management Unit (CMU). I was never in the CMU, which mostly houses terrorists and individuals tied to organizations the U.S. is actively at war with. When I was inside, that meant Al-Qaeda, Taliban, and ISIS operatives, along with members of The Order and other organized subversive groups. The United States has some of the harshest sentencing laws in the world. Out of about 9 billion people globally, roughly 8 million are incarcerated — and 2 million of them are here in the U.S. That means we hold 25% of the world’s prison population but make up only 4% of its people. We also have the world’s highest recidivism rate: about 63% return to prison within two years of release. In my experience, there’s almost nothing in federal prison that prepares you for life afterward. The mental rewiring needed to survive inside is often destructive outside. Without real prison and criminal justice reform, we’ll keep producing men who are institutionalized and struggling to function in a free society. I’m here to answer real questions — about doing time, helping incarcerated loved ones, and navigating the legal maze. I’ve spent years helping men file appeals, briefs, and motions, and I understand how district, circuit, and Supreme Court rulings differ — and why federal law can contradict itself. If you’re seeking clarity about the system or someone caught in it, I’m here to help I spent 25 years in federal prison — mostly in medium and high-security facilities, with some time in the SMU and lows. I write about incarceration, reentry, and the realities of America’s justice system, offering firsthand insight and guidance for those affected by it. #PrisonReform #CriminalJusticeReform

Why the United States Cannot End Dual Citizenship Without Changing the Constitution The key protection for dual citizenship in the United States comes from Afroyim v. Rusk (1967). In that landmark case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Congress does not have the power to strip a person of their U.S. citizenship without their voluntary consent. Citizenship can only be lost if the individual intentionally chooses to give it up. Because of Afroyim, the United States accepts that many forms of dual citizenship are constitutionally protected. This includes situations where: • a person becomes a U.S. citizen while retaining another nationality, or • a U.S. citizen later acquires a foreign citizenship. Current U.S. law, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), also permits dual nationality. There is no requirement for new Americans to renounce prior citizenships when naturalizing. Under this constitutional framework, dual or multiple citizenship is allowed. Since this protection stems from the Fourteenth Amendment and more than 50 years of Supreme Court interpretation, Congress cannot eliminate dual citizenship simply by passing a new law. Any statute banning dual citizenship or automatically revoking citizenship from dual nationals would almost certainly be ruled unconstitutional. This is why proposals such as the Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 face serious legal obstacles. That bill would require American dual nationals to renounce their foreign citizenship or lose U.S. citizenship. But this contradicts Afroyim, which holds that citizenship cannot be taken away merely because of passive status, such as holding another passport. Loss of citizenship must always be voluntary, not automatic. For the United States to truly abolish dual citizenship—especially for existing dual nationals—it would require: 1. A constitutional amendment, or 2. A major shift in Supreme Court doctrine, reversing or significantly narrowing Afroyim.#Citizenship #DualCitizen

Correcting misinformation should be easy, but somehow it turns into the hardest thing in the room. You bring facts that can be checked in seconds, and instead of people looking them up, they double down on whatever story makes them comfortable. It stops being a conversation and becomes a wall. A wall that refuses to move. A wall that talks back. A wall that gets offended by the truth long before it ever considers reading it. What makes it worse is that the people arguing the loudest usually offer nothing but confidence. No sources. No dates. No history. Just the same recycled talking points that fall apart the moment you hold them up to the light. And when you correct them, the focus shifts. Suddenly the problem is not the false information they posted. The problem is your tone, your firmness, your refusal to let a lie sit in peace. And after a while, that gets heavy. You hold your tongue. You try to stay calm. You try to respond professionally even when someone is calling you a liar about something that is publicly documented. But every now and then, that wall pushes one time too many, and you push back. Not because you hate anyone. Not because you are angry for no reason. But because being treated like your knowledge has no value gets old. Correcting misinformation feels like a fight even when it should not be. The truth is easy. The denial is the wall. #CommunityFeed #OnlineBehavior #TruthMatters #Misinformation #WhyWeSpeak #LataraSpeaksTruth

When Malcolm X Spoke On Kennedy’s Death

On December 1, 1963, Malcolm X was asked for his reaction to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. He was one of the most closely watched public figures in the country at the time, and reporters pressed him for a comment. Malcolm X responded with the words that would echo for decades. He said it was a case of chickens coming home to roost. He framed the event as part of a larger pattern of violence in the United States during that era. He argued that a nation shaped by political bloodshed could not avoid that same violence returning to its doorstep. The remark caused an immediate national uproar. It was interpreted as insensitive and divisive, and it clashed with the public grief that followed the assassination. The Nation of Islam suspended him from speaking publicly after the comments. His relationship with the organization would continue to strain in the months that followed. This moment is often oversimplified, but it marked a turning point. It pushed Malcolm X to reconsider his alliances, rethink his voice, and eventually pursue a broader message about global human rights. What happened on December 1 became one of the first steps toward the transformation that shaped the final years of his life. #MalcolmX #OnThisDay #AmericanHistory #PoliticalHistory #NewsBreakCommunity #HistoricVoices #HistoricMoments #AmericanLegacy