LocalAll

Explore Page

RonC

At the burning center of the day, when life feels fully exposed, Psalm 91 does not offer escape—it reveals a greater reality: there is a shadow that does not shrink. “Whoever dwells in the shelter of the Most High…”—this is the covering of El Elyon, the One who stands above every power, every fear, every unseen force. His sovereignty is not distant; it is protective. “To rest in the shadow of the Almighty”—this is the nearness of El Shaddai, the All-Sufficient One whose strength is not merely displayed, but shared with those who abide. His shadow is not absence of light—it is the evidence of His closeness. “I will say of the Lord…”—this is covenant language, the name YHWH. The self-existent, ever-present God who binds Himself to His people. He is not a distant deity; He is the One who says, “I will be with you.” And in that Name, forgetfulness is impossible. “He is my refuge and my fortress”—this is YHWH Sabaoth, the Commander of heaven’s armies. You are not merely protected—you are defended. To dwell here is to live inside a truth unshaken: the one held by El Elyon, sustained by El Shaddai, known by YHWH, and defended by YHWH Sabaoth will never be forsaken, never be overlooked, never be forgotten. Even at high noon—especially at high noon—you are covered.

Michael Tovornik

Acts 9:9-11 NIV [9] For three days he was blind, and did not eat or drink anything. [10] In Damascus there was a disciple named Ananias. The Lord called to him in a vision, “Ananias!” “Yes, Lord,” he answered. [11] The Lord told him, “Go to the house of Judas on Straight Street and ask for a man from Tarsus named Saul, for he is praying. Paul was in Corinth at this time and many of the Gentiles were becoming Christian. Paul stayed in Corinth teaching about Jesus for a year and a half. He got to know the Corinthians well and that may account for the two long letters he sent them. Some parts of the letters praised them for the good work they were doing, and some chastised them for falling back into old ways or for arguing among themselves as to which of them had greater gifts from God. It is in these letters to the Corinthians that we learn of God's plan to distribute the gifts needed for the community of believers to thrive if each person uses his or her gifts for the benefit of others. He teaches them about the importance of fellowship but not to take that time as a chance for a free meal at the expense of others. Paul knew that God was with him in his preaching and his teachings. As God had promised Samuel and the prophets that he would give them the words to say and they trusted God, Paul also trusted in God. He did run into problems with some of the Jewish leaders who felt that he was giving false teachings about how to worship God that was contrary to Jewish Law but God was present in this as well. It was not long after this that he left Corinth and headed to Syria. Jesus will not let us go without his guidance either. When we give witness to our faith, God will give us the words we need and the courage to share them. We, too, are disciples because of our baptism.

Freddy Gibbs

ngo Hasselbach once the eader of a neo-Nazi group in East Berlin, describes a moment in his memoir. "Führer-Ex." when he realized that the hatred driving his life wasn't based on anything real. He woke up expecting another day of "fighting enemies" but suddenly recognized that he had never actually met a Jewish person, though he had beaten many to within an inch of their ives. His entire worldview had been buil t out of other people's stories, propaganda and the emotional maps he carried inside himself. That moment--the collision between the map and the territory-- was the beginning of his break from extremism. It's a reminder that prejudice is always a second-hand emotion. It's never about rea people; it's about the stories we inherit, the fears we cultivate, and the strangers we imagine. He eventually came to realize that his emnity for Jews was displaced rage toward his abusive father

justme

A Big Change to Medicare Prior Authorization: 7‑Day Deadline Now Mandatory By Brandon Marcus, Medicare just made a move that could seriously speed up healthcare decisions for millions of Americans. A new rule now requires insurers to respond to prior authorization requests within a strict seven-day window, and that deadline could make a real difference when timing matters most. Patients and providers often face frustrating delays that stall treatments, create stress, and sometimes worsen health outcomes. This update aims to cut through that red tape and bring faster answers to critical medical decisions. For anyone navigating Medicare, this change deserves close attention because it directly affects access to care and peace of mind. What the 7-Day Prior Authorization Rule Actually Means Medicare’s new rule sets a firm seven-day deadline for insurers to approve or deny prior authorization requests, replacing timelines that often stretched unpredictably. That means once a doctor submits a request for a procedure, test, or medication, the clock starts ticking immediately. Insurers must now act quickly, which reduces waiting periods that previously left patients stuck in limbo. Faster decisions can lead to quicker treatments, especially for conditions that cannot afford delays. This shift marks a clear effort to make the system more responsive and patient-centered. Healthcare providers have long voiced concerns about how prior authorization slows down care, and this rule directly addresses those complaints. Patients often experienced delays that lasted weeks, sometimes forcing them to postpone essential treatments or pay out of pocket. With the new deadline, providers can plan care with more confidence and fewer administrative hurdles. The change also encourages insurers to streamline their internal processes to meet the requirement

justme

10 Food Additives Already Banned or Being Phased Out Under RFK Jr.’s HHS 1 day ago Greg Greg Wilson, CFA user • @gregwilso_daefd • This article was originally published on ChaChingQueen.com, a site my wife and I own. AI was used for light editing, formatting, and readability. But a human (me!) wrote and edited this. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Department of Health and Human Services has put food additives back at the center of the national health debate. Many of these foods are not being banned as categories. What is changing is the ingredient list, and in many cases, the most likely outcome is reformulation. In April 2025, the Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration announced measures to phase out petroleum-based synthetic dyes from the nation’s food supply, and the Food and Drug Administration has since tracked company pledges to remove those colors over time. In this article, we look at 10 food additives that are already banned or being phased out under Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s HHS. We also look at the kinds of foods they have appeared in and what those changes could mean for the products people actually buy. BVO: Citrus Sodas and Fruit-Flavored Drinks Brominated vegetable oil, or BVO, is one of the clearest examples of an additive that is already out. The Food and Drug Administration issued a final rule on July 3, 2024, revoking the regulation that allowed BVO in food, with the rule taking effect on August 2, 2024 and a one-year compliance period to give companies time to reformulate and relabel products. BVO’s authorized use was narrow but common enough to matter: it was used to stabilize flavoring oils in fruit-flavored beverages. That means the foods most affected were citrus sodas and similar fruit-flavored drinks

Explore - Page 33 | LocalAll