Tag Page finance

#finance
Douglas Mccoy

crypto shrugs off whale moves—profit-taking hits sol & doge

Bitcoin just posted its highest weekly close ever—just under $110K—yet the market feels oddly unfazed. Dormant whale wallets moved $8B worth of BTC, a classic market-shaking headline. But traders barely blinked. Instead, attention shifted toward profit-taking across altcoins. Solana slipped 2.3%, dogecoin dropped over 4%, and even meme-fueled momentum couldn’t save them this time. Meanwhile, ether and XRP held their ground, trading flat through the noise. This week was supposed to be quiet: holiday liquidity, tariff overhangs, geopolitical drama. But crypto is still finding ways to stay bid. Elon-driven hype, bullish options flows, and steady ETF inflows are keeping risk appetite alive. Market correlations are high—BTC is still moving in lockstep with equities. But there’s an undercurrent of anticipation. Analysts now eye a break above $112K, with targets as high as $120K by month-end. Ethereum, too, could test $3K, buoyed by whale accumulation and a friendlier U.S. policy backdrop. It may be a hot, quiet summer. But the next breakout might not knock—it might just burst through the door. #Finance #MakeMoney

crypto shrugs off whale moves—profit-taking hits sol & doge
Jennifer Howard

crypto’s path to legitimacy now runs through carf

For over a decade, crypto lived in the shadows—fast, borderless, and gloriously unbothered by bureaucracy. But that era is closing fast. Starting 2027, more than 60 countries will begin enforcing the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF). Europe and the UK go first. Then come Singapore, Hong Kong, the UAE, and eventually, the U.S. And with it, the system changes: platforms must report who sent what, to whom, how much, and when. Not once a year—continuously. To some, it feels like the soul of crypto is under siege. Privacy advocates and cypherpunks see this as the final nail in the coffin of decentralization. But here’s the catch: CARF isn’t killing crypto. It’s legitimizing it. The magic of crypto has always been freedom: send USDT in seconds, no questions, no banks. That freedom made it powerful—but also unaccountable. And regulators watched billions move through a black hole, untaxed and untraced. With CARF, the lights come on. Service providers are already reacting. Many are quietly overhauling systems, hiring compliance staff, prepping infrastructure. Some might exit early-adopter jurisdictions or hike fees to offset legal costs. But the direction is clear: crypto is stepping into the system. This shift comes with pain. Fewer shadows, more scrutiny. Wallets that once felt invisible may no longer be. Platforms will ask more questions. But here’s what else it brings: legal clarity, global standards, institutional comfort—and, finally, legitimacy. That legitimacy unlocks scale. Long-term capital, less price chaos, clearer protections for users. For most, CARF will eventually make taxes easier, not harder. And for builders, it marks a new foundation: not a retreat from crypto’s ideals, but a negotiation with reality. Crypto isn’t dying. It’s growing up. #Finance #MakeMoney

crypto’s path to legitimacy now runs through carf
Alexandra Burns

chart of the week: wall street has claimed bitcoin — now what?

Bitcoin’s dance with traditional markets just keeps getting closer. The latest data shows its correlation with U.S. equities remains stubbornly high, while its connection to gold and the U.S. dollar is virtually nonexistent. For years, many hoped bitcoin would behave like “digital gold,” a safe haven uncorrelated to stocks and fiat. But Wall Street’s growing embrace of bitcoin seems to be rewriting that narrative. When bitcoin moves almost in lockstep with equities, it loses some of its magic as a portfolio diversifier or crisis hedge. The question now is: as institutional players dominate the space, will bitcoin remain the rebellious outsider it once was? Or will it become yet another Wall Street asset, vulnerable to the same cycles and shocks? This shift isn’t just about price charts—it’s about bitcoin’s evolving identity. For those still dreaming of a truly independent crypto, it’s time to reckon with the reality: Wall Street has claimed bitcoin, for better or worse. #Finance #MakeMoney

chart of the week: wall street has claimed bitcoin — now what?
Alexandra Burns

hackers behind $140 million brazil banking heist are now using crypto to launder their loot

In late June, a sophisticated hacking group pulled off one of the biggest cyber heists targeting Brazil’s Central Bank service provider, stealing a jaw-dropping $140 million. But what happened next reveals a darker side of the crypto world: these criminals are turning to cryptocurrencies to clean their ill-gotten gains. On June 30th, attackers bribed an insider at C&M Software, the Central Bank’s service vendor, gaining access to six financial institutions’ reserve accounts, including BMP. This insider leak opened the door for unauthorized transfers of massive fiat sums. But rather than trying to move all the stolen cash directly through banks or traditional channels, the hackers began swapping between $30 million and $40 million of their haul into bitcoin, ether, and tether—using Latin American OTC desks and exchanges, according to blockchain analyst ZachXBT. This laundering tactic isn’t new. It echoes a recent attack on Coinbase, where bribed customer service agents exposed sensitive data of 69,000 users. The key point is that even as crypto gains regulatory acceptance in Brazil—lawmakers proposed allowing investment funds exposure to digital assets as recently as February—the industry’s dark underbelly remains exposed to abuse. Crypto’s promise of borderless, pseudonymous transactions makes it a perfect tool for hackers and scammers to move money swiftly and discreetly. As the numbers show, this trend is escalating: security firm CertiK reports that crypto investors lost $2.5 billion to hacks and scams in the first half of 2025 alone. The Brazil banking hack serves as a stark reminder—while blockchain technology can empower financial freedom, it also equips criminals with new avenues to launder money and evade law enforcement. Vigilance and stronger safeguards are more critical than ever. #Finance #MakeMoney

hackers behind $140 million brazil banking heist are now using crypto to launder their loot
Douglas Mccoy

💥 someone just moved $8.6B worth of bitcoin from 2011. here’s what you’re not being told.

Late on Friday, something that hasn’t happened in over a decade shook the crypto world. Eight wallets, dormant since 2011, suddenly moved exactly 10,000 BTC each, sending a staggering total of $8.6 billion into brand-new SegWit addresses. These coins—often called “Satoshi-era bitcoin” because they were mined or received in Bitcoin’s earliest days—had been untouched for more than 14 years. No exchange deposits, no cashing out, just quiet transfers that immediately sparked curiosity and concern. What makes this even more intriguing is what happened just an hour before the Bitcoin moved. A suspicious transaction involving over 10,000 Bitcoin Cash tokens, worth nearly $5 million, was flagged. This transfer, connected to one of the whale wallets, looked like a subtle test—a covert way to check private key access without alerting the market or watchdogs. Bitcoin Cash, unlike Bitcoin, flies under the radar in whale-watching circles, making it a perfect testing ground. But here’s the kicker: only one of the BCH addresses tied to these wallets was touched during this test. Why sweep only one wallet’s funds? Why not all eight if someone truly controlled the private keys? This partial movement hints at something less than full access—maybe a leak, maybe someone with limited control. This situation isn’t just about dormant wallets waking up. It strikes at the heart of Bitcoin’s security assumptions. Early Bitcoin addresses used a format called Pay-to-Public-Key (P2PK), which reveals the full public key once the wallet makes a transaction. This exposure leaves those wallets vulnerable to future quantum computing attacks, should large-scale quantum machines ever materialize. The idea that someone could be quietly probing these keys, preparing for a quantum future, is chilling. So far, none of the coins have been cashed out or sent to exchanges. Instead, they remain locked in new wallets, untouched by markets. That silence speaks volumes—it suggests deliberate caution and maybe a test of patience or power. This is not about greed or a quick flip; it’s about control, secrets, and timing. Whether this means private keys were leaked, quantum attacks are looming, or something else entirely, the move sends a warning: Bitcoin might not be as invulnerable as many believe. The quiet movement of billions of dollars in nearly ancient coins should make every crypto watcher pause and think about what could come next. No one wakes up 14-year-old wallets for no reason. And no one tests keys on the quiet sidechain of Bitcoin Cash unless they have something to hide. Stay alert. The next move might not be so quiet. #Finance #MakeMoney

💥 someone just moved $8.6B worth of bitcoin from 2011. here’s what you’re not being told.
Jennifer Howard

🧵shared sequencers: the hidden game behind L2 neutrality

1/ Rollups scale Ethereum. But right now, they’re… kinda lonely. Each L2 has its own sequencer — deciding which transactions go first. This is fine... until it's not. 👇 2/ If the sequencer is down? No blocks. If it’s malicious? It can reorder, censor, or MEV the hell out of you. Sequencer centralization is rollup’s dirty secret. 3/ Enter: shared sequencers. Instead of each rollup building its own infra, they plug into a shared layer. This adds resilience, neutrality, and possibly cross-rollup atomicity. But it’s not that simple. 4/ The challenge? Latency tradeoffs Fair ordering guarantees Who gets to run the sequencer network? How do you enforce neutrality? Shared sequencers help decentralize… but also concentrate power in new places. 5/ The L2 wars won’t be won by TPS or TVL alone. It’ll come down to… who controls the sequencer? #Finance #MakeMoney

🧵shared sequencers: the hidden game behind L2 neutrality
Jennifer Howard

🧵meme coins are dead. long live meme protocols.

1/ 2021: You aped Doge. 2022: You regretted it. 2023: You laughed at PEPE. 2024: You bought WIF and doubled your bag. Now, it’s 2025. What if the meme... is the product? 👇 2/ Berachain is not a meme coin. It’s a full-stack EVM chain. But its brand? Literal bears. Smoking, drinking, gambling bears. It started as a joke. Now it’s building a modular L1 with native liquidity incentive layers. 3/ Here’s the twist: Berachain uses Proof of Liquidity. You don’t stake tokens to be a validator. You LP tokens to earn voting power. The chain’s security model is tied to how much liquidity you provide to the ecosystem. 4/ Why this matters: Attention is scarce. Memes are efficient. If your L1 can capture mindshare and liquidity — that’s leverage. Berachain turns meme culture into infrastructure. That’s no joke. 5/ Meme coins fade. Meme protocols evolve. In crypto, narrative is the new consensus. #Finance #MakeMoney

🧵meme coins are dead. long live meme protocols.
Jennifer Howard

🧵LRTs: the new DeFi primitive — or just fancy rehypothecation?

1/ Lido gave us liquid staking. EigenLayer took it further. Now we have rsETH, ezETH, wBETH, LsETH… This isn’t just “more staking”. It’s yield-on-yield composability. But is that a feature — or a risk? 👇 2/ LRTs (Liquid Restaking Tokens) stack exposure: You stake ETH. ETH gets restaked on EigenLayer. You get rsETH. rsETH gets LP’d or farmed. Each layer adds yield. Each layer adds risk. 3/ The danger? LRT protocols are often centralized at launch. Slashing conditions are opaque. And validator behavior is now tied to multiple incentive layers. This creates reflexive risk. Think: Luna + Anchor + Curve — all over again. 4/ LRTs are composable. But not “plug-and-play”. Before you chase that sweet APR, ask: Who can trigger slashing? What happens in a withdrawal run? Is the LRT more like a bond... or a balloon? 5/ Restaking is real innovation. But don’t get drunk on leverage. Some of these yields are paid in hopium. #Finance #MakeMoney

🧵LRTs: the new DeFi primitive — or just fancy rehypothecation?
Jennifer Howard

🧵prettier charts ≠ better data

1/ DeFi depends on oracles. Without them, protocols are flying blind. But here's the problem: Oracles are not just data feeds. They are systems of trust. 👇 2/ Price oracles don’t just report the truth — they decide when it’s true. A 15s delay? That’s the difference between a healthy liquidation or a protocol exploit. Most hacks? Start with the oracle. 3/ Compare: Chainlink: secure, decentralized, but slow and costly. Pyth: fast, low-latency — but updates only on trades, not time. UMA: optimistic oracle — fast by default, but challengeable. Each one trades off speed, cost, and trust assumptions. 4/ You can’t just pick an oracle. You have to design around it. If your protocol assumes real-time data, you'd better be damn sure your oracle can deliver. Otherwise? Someone will front-run you. Or drain your vault. 5/ Better charts don’t mean better data. Look deeper. Because in DeFi, whoever controls the oracle... controls reality. #Finance #MakeMoney

🧵prettier charts ≠ better data
Jennifer Howard

🧵modular blockchains aren't legos — they're supply chains

1/ You’ve heard it before: "Modular blockchains are like Lego bricks — stack what you need." Nice metaphor. But misleading. Because real modular systems have trade-offs, dependencies… and bottlenecks. Let’s go deeper. 👇 2/ In a true modular architecture, tasks like execution, settlement, data availability (DA), and consensus are separated across layers. This gives flexibility — but at the cost of coordination. Think less "toy bricks" — more like a supply chain with delays, interfaces, and failure points. 3/ Take Optimism and Celestia. Optimism: Executes on its own rollup, settles to Ethereum, and may use EigenDA for data. Celestia: Does only data availability. Other chains must bring their own execution logic. Same “modular” claim. Totally different stack. 4/ The catch? You can outsource performance but not outsource responsibility. If one piece fails — say, a DA layer goes down — the whole chain can stall. That’s why coordination and trust assumptions matter more than ever. (And why shared sequencers are a hot topic.) 5/ Modular is powerful. But not magic. Before you ape into a modular L2, ask: Who handles data? Where’s execution verified? What happens on failure? Because in this Lego box, some bricks break. #Finance #MakeMoney

🧵modular blockchains aren't legos — they're supply chains